|
Privilege and responsibility
Many authors who argue
for justice for Palestinians tend to see the Jews as possessing
divine privileges only in the past. Burge, however, sees them as a
people of promise still. He argues that the land promise to Abraham
is still relevant but stresses that the enjoyment of it requires
justice and righteousness, especially towards the “alien”. This is
the point he wants to get over to Christian Zionists. His exposure
of the theft of some Palestinian land by the Israeli authorities is
well-researched, drawing on new but not uncontested studies by
Israeli historians and activists. However, the use of terms like
“ethnic-cleansing” is not helpful. Burge also hopes for further
gospel blessing for the Jews as per Paul’s teaching in Romans 11. He
opposes Dispensationalism, not only because it fails to see the
spiritual nature of Christ’s kingdom but also because it tends to
encourage the acceptance of injustices, seeing the present situation
as having parallels with Joshua’s invasion of the land under the
Mosaic covenant.
Burge rightly asks if
we are not expecting too much of Israel. After all, are they any
different to other nations, the history of which shows similar
failures? His answer is that Israel knows better, and this is why
she is criticised in the world’s media. Her attempt to consistently
claim the moral high ground is exposed as flawed; she and her
citizens are sinful like others, and that is why Christians who view
Israel as a nation returning to the Land with God’s blessing should
speak to her of God’s requirements.
Towards the end of the
book Burge introduces us to Palestinian Christian leaders. His
interest in stirring a concern for them among Christians in the West
leads him to say little about Jewish Christians and the persecution
suffered by them, because it does not stem from the Israeli
government. However, current attempts at fellowship between
believers on either side of the political conflict are
described.
Justice and peace
His concern for
Palestinians who are called “Christian” – as opposed to Muslim –
leads him to make common religious cause with those who are not
evangelical, and this will disappoint and confuse many readers.
However, his approach is not altogether surprising because his
paramount concern for Palestinian Christians is that they should be
treated justly by the State of Israel, and in this he can make
common cause with non-evangelicals.
The book ends on a
note of urgency because Burge believes that there is a growing
unwillingness among people on both sides to continue seeking a
peaceful solution. I was disappointed that he did not give a much
greater emphasis to the need of Christians to support the work of
the gospel in the land whether to Jew or Arab. There is no doubt
that world peace depends on the resolution of this conflict but,
without wanting to be dismissive of social and political programmes,
our first priority should be to proclaim the gospel. The book did
not leave me with the impression that Burge believes that.
Whose Land? Whose
Promise? certainly underscores
the fact that political solutions are a long way off and that
harmony between Jews and Arabs is even further away. It seems to
this reviewer that God is setting the stage for something only he
can solve, by the power of the gospel, which alone can unite Jew and
Palestinian in one new man in Messiah. The world is watching and God
will surely act for his glory. To read this book is to be made more
aware of the injustices on Israel’s side, of the ever-deepening
animosities between Jews and Arabs, and Israel’s desperate need of
the gospel.
This article first appeared in the
March 2004 edition of the
Herald
Archive
List |